Animal Testing Should Be Legal Argumentative Essay

Examples of applied research include disease treatment testing, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetic testing. In education, animal experimentation is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses. The practice is regulated to varying degrees in different countries. Obviously, in vitro experiments (using experimental tubes) are slow and incomplete. This means that scientific research is delayed and sometimes no results are obtained. It is important to remember that animal experimentation has contributed significantly to this since its introduction a few decades ago. It has remained a viable, reliable and considerable experimental design for pharmaceuticals and other scientific research. Most people believe that animal testing is essential for drug and vaccine research. This is true in a sense because scientists have developed many vaccines for certain viruses. However, during the process, the animals are poorly treated, and their cages are in a terrible condition.

Most of the chemicals given to these patients […] Every year, more than 110 million animals are killed in American laboratories. 95% of all drugs that prove safe and effective in animal studies fail in human studies. Laboratories that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempt from minimum protection under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). Currently, 52% of adults in the United States oppose the use of animals in scientific research. These are the ethical arguments that have been published in relation to this topic. It forms the center of different people`s arguments. It is important to point out that animal testing has many provisions that deserve to be mentioned in different contexts. This refers to its viability and effectiveness in revealing the least studied claims about life.

According to various sources, some arguments relating to aspects of animal testing are invalid and misleading (Hayhurst, 2000). They simply stem from inappropriate compassion for animals. When thinking of a good title for an essay on animal testing for medical purposes, be sure to consider this contentious point. Why is it that the Animal Welfare Act leaves out fish, mice and rats? Researchers are allowed to treat these animals because they need them for their experiments. Try to explore how moral this situation is. The effects may be more devastating than when applied to laboratory animals (Schmidt, 2001). For example, developments and studies on anti-HIV drugs may not occur in humans in their initial stages. It is advisable to develop them through animal experiments before they are made usable by humans. It is possible to adjust the composition of the given compound to reveal its viable concentrations. Emerging with immediate results supports the application of animal experimentation and contributes massively to it in this context. The idea of using animals in experiments is not new. In fact, it is a practice that dates back to 500 BC; And even then, there were those who supported this idea and those who were against it.

They say it is cruel and inhumane to test products with animals and call for the development of new alternative techniques that make animal testing superfluous. The definition of animal cruelty varies from person to person, and although it is occasionally discussed, many people tend to downplay seriousness. Cruelty to animals comes in many forms, such as scientific research, abandonment, abuse, etc. Experiments and atrocities committed should be banned, because animals have the same […] Each animal testing test contains an argument on verifying the toxicity of medical treatment during animal testing procedures. It is contrary to all ethical standards to test a new drug on people and risk their lives. The Helsinki Medical Association says animal testing should always take precedence over human experimentation A test conclusion on animal testing always refers to the fact that the structure of animal organisms, which is similar to that of humans, makes it the most suitable material for research in product testing in the fields of medicine and cosmetics. Animal and human bodies have the same or similar processes. It is believed that tests can be done on cellular organisms, but it is doubtful that this will work, as these tissues cannot be tested for blindness or blood pressure problems. According to Schmidt (2001), who discusses aspects of animal testing, it is important to conclude that what is not consumable for laboratory animals is also consumable for humans. It is possible to notice the side effects of drugs in animals, make appropriate changes to the composition of the drug being tested and appear later with an effective, safe and powerful compound worthy of use by humans. Animal experimentation is a useful phenomenon in biological, medical and other scientific studies that require their inclusion. The phenomenon is useful, viable and should be adopted despite opposing views.

Animal studies help in the development of effective, safe, viable, qualitative and less toxic drugs. Given the merits of animal testing, their application and progress should continue, taking into account ethical concerns. Animal testing typically includes vertebrates such as rodents, cats, dogs, birds, and guinea pigs, among others. Since this is a controversial phenomenon where one can argue for or against the law, this article supports aspects of animal testing with many reasons based on their feasibility in the study of pharmacological compounds. Without animal experimentation, many of the drugs that currently help humanity might have been missing. In general, debates about the use of animals in testing for medical research tests have been historically known for centuries. After the introduction of the animal testing trial, it is typical to present the claims of the promoters. They imply that animal testing does not cause intentional harm; In addition, the animals are well cared for, fed and well treated.

In addition, they note that the lack of effective alternatives makes it impossible to eliminate this practice. They also highlight the benefits of saving lives through animal testing. Nevertheless, some environmental organizations that work for the protection of animals no longer require animals in research and testing due to cruel and inhumane practices. Cruelty to animals can be defined in several ways: violence against animals in any way, non-care of animals, neglect of animals. Causing psychological harm to animals in the form of distress, torment or terror can also constitute cruelty to animals (RSPCA). For example, when choosing eyeliner or other makeup products, people […] The need for efficacy, safety, novelty and harmlessness in the field of drug use requires extensive investigative experiments, which can only occur if laboratory animals are involved. First, some animals have systems similar to those of humans; Thus, the possibility of using such animals offers a greater chance of conducting an elaborate experimental study. In the United States of America, many organizations are debating whether or not to ban animal testing. Some people believe that there are several reasons why animal testing should be done. But others believe that animal testing is completely wrong. Some experts believe that there are other options that […] Organizations such as PETA are committed to broadening the spectrum of relevant research and making the process of developing alternative test methods faster and more efficient.

It is reasonable that an animal testing trial by a student who supports this view should include the requirement to facilitate animal testing. It will also include an argument that animal testing does not guarantee absolutely valid results, because animal experiments are different from those performed on humans; Therefore, the question arises as to whether animal experiments make practical sense. The arguments of those who support animal testing are understandable in certain situations, and in this situation the views are valid and their views must be respected. And while animal testing has drawbacks, there are also advantages. To the detriment of the life of an animal or conveniently, the life of a human […] Some students even use the fact of humane treatment of animals in the title of the animal experimentation trial. Researchers always take into account the conditions and consequences of experiments and take care of the animals. Summary The Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which came into force in August 1966, regulates the treatment and care of animals in research (Murnaghan 4). However, researchers use about 26 million animals each year for scientific and commercial testing in the United States (The Flaws and Human Harms). These operations occur during the development of medical treatments that reduce toxicity in […] Another problem is that humans cannot be used as laboratory animals. Medicinal products administered to humans must be of a certain quality, of minimal toxicity, viable for use, strong, safe and effective.

This means that they have been reviewed and approved by the relevant bodies after scientific research. If animal experiments are abandoned, no effective experiments will take place on biological vessels.